The Commission for Productivity issued a stern response to recent criticism, directly condemning attacks on its institutional integrity. In a statement made public, the body highlighted that it considers such moves unacceptable, clearly stating that it does not accept attempts to diminish its authority and independence in conducting professional assessments.
The key aspect of the dispute relates to a recent assessment issued by the commission itself, which focused on the complexity and consequences of the value-added tax (GST) agreement in the Western Australian region. According to available information, this assessment indicated that the costs and financial obligations associated with the agreement were higher than initially expected, attracting significant public and political attention.
Angela Jackson, a commissioner within this body, directly commented on the current situation, expressing deep disappointment with the stance of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese. According to her, the government has refused to implement necessary changes regarding the regulation of the value-added tax, which she considers a significant failure in managing this key economic issue.
Despite political pressure, the commission stated that its methodology and decision-making process would remain unchanged. It was emphasised that the work of the body should not be subject to political influence, and that it is essential to preserve professional expertise and independence. The commission explicitly stated that it is above political pressures, and that it will continue to work based on professional assessments and facts, regardless of political pressures or public controversy. This message was presented as a basis for preserving the integrity of the institution in future work processes.
