A statement by gynaecologist and obstetrician Petra Kejla has sparked heated debate on social media, Slobodna Dalmacija reports.
Petra Kejla appeared as a guest on HR1, where she discussed the possibilities of conception. During her appearance, her claim that penetrative sexual intercourse is not always necessary for pregnancy attracted particular attention.
This specific claim became the central topic of the discussion that subsequently developed on social media. According to available information, the debate was heated, and the statement by the gynaecologist and obstetrician provoked numerous reactions.
The details of the statement related to the possibilities of conception about which the doctor spoke in the HR1 programme. The focus was on the claim that penetrative sexual intercourse is not always the necessary path to pregnancy.
Apart from the statement itself, no additional content from the appearance is known from the available facts. The source notes that this is a statement that sparked heated debate on social media, with the context of the debate linked to the HR1 appearance and the topic of conception possibilities.
